I typically love your out-of-the-box views on anything you write about. In this case, though, I respectfully disagree. Yes, limiting boosts is a terrible idea. It's as terrible as the whole DEI concept. Both violate the premise of let-the-best-man win. That's the premise that has made evolution such a successful concept that no other concept has ever come close to. To gt a story boosted I need to dedicate literally days to its conception, writing, fact checking, re-writing, creating illustrative images and so forth. Why should I all of a sudden accept a quota in favor of writers whose only qualifying characteristic is being a newbie? I don't. I know that this view probably makes me unpopular among the DEI crowd and newbie writers. But I was a newbie writer myself once, I didn't enjoy the luxury of the newbie-quota, and I still made it. The hard work to get there sharpened my skills as a writer. Wouldn't you want that type of quality for our future readers, too?